Seducing an American girl

Seduction is an art, but it cannot be learned. It is a trait that is inbuilt and the spearhead of this is desire. I have had my fair share of women in my life, but one incident with an American girl remains unforgettable. Frankly, she was not a girl but a young lady doctor. That's a lot of qualification, so I wonder whether to call it seduction or by any other name. But in any case, I was older to her by 2 decades.

The second question that bugs me is whether I used my influence as the boss to have carnal knowledge of her body or was it plain and simple an act of mutual consent. Frankly, I have no clear cut answer to this.

Over a decade back I had taken over as the project Director of a UN aided tribal welfare project. It was a place in the wilderness, almost as the city was about 30 km away. I enjoyed my work which took me in my land cruiser to distant and remote parts of the Western Ghats. I interacted with the tribal people and realized that this group had been left in a time warp and needed a concerted and conscientious push to take them forward.

As the director, I had a string of highly qualified doctors and scientists to help me and they were a self-less lot. Most were from the USA with idealist zeal. One of the doctors from the USA was from New York. She was about 26-28 and a typical American girl. She came from a broken home as her father had deserted her mother.  Maybe that told on her psyche. Invariably Sally (I will give her this name and not the actual one) and I were thrown a lot together in our work. As a woman, I was always concerned for her and invariably took her for trips into tribal areas with me.

This constant companionship began to have an effect on me and I used to observe her for long periods. She had lovely legs and small breasts that sometimes strained against the blouse. She wore short skirts or jeans, but it was Sally in skirts that I loved to see. She was positively sexy and the flames of desire soon began to overtake me.

The monsoon in the Ghats is like an avalanche and one day in the monsoon I parked the cruiser under a tree and allowed the rain to lessen. At that critical moment, we sat together in the vehicle and I opened a flask of coffee which I always carried with me. I gave her and she was positively happy.  I then did something inexplicable. Normally I would never have done it, but this time I did. I said 

“Sally, you are beautiful".

She just smiled. Maybe she was aware of my longing for her as I had long been eyeing her on various trips.

“Sally I desire you" 

I said these words in a matter of fact way. I wonder how Don Juan or any great seducer would have acted, but I said the forbidden words.  Her reply astonished me. She said

“I know".

The heavens now broke asunder and thunder boomed and boomed again and the visibility outside was reduced to zero. The lashing rain and my desire or sally's desire moved on one road: up the peak of passion. I caught her hand and kissed it and then bent low and lifted her feet and took the sneakers off her and began sucking her toes succinctly.

"Stop," she said “Don’t. Nobody has done this to me ".

I continued sucking her toes and whispered: “Sally let me worship you". This is the way love is done in the East as per the Kama sutra".

I elongated the back seat and laid Sally on it as from the toes I moved up, tracing a pattern with my tongue. I remember baring her mons and then started a long kiss of the most feminine part of her body.

“No” she whispered hoarsely" No! Don’t, nobody has done this to me ".

I tasted her and paid my homage as advised by Vatsyayana in his monumental l treatise. I spent what an eon was ministering her before after almost 40 minutes it was over. I had followed the Tantric ritual of sex and as I continued I knew that I was the victor.

What a seduction. I will never forget it. Sally remained for 3 more months and it was a heady affair. What happened after that is another story, but friends sometimes it is good to get over one's thoughts and deeds as it is expiations from the mind of acts that are on the spur of the moment.

Dating Girls, Bars and Life in the UAE

A Fine Holiday

Beer in Dubai

The UAE is a swell place and one which is worth a holiday if you have money and want a high-end life. It has some of the best bars and night joints and all you b need is liquid cash and no place in the world can offer you anything better. Man's favorite sport is women and that applies to me as well and I recommend no better place for a freakout anywhere else than Dubai or Abu Dhabi. Here some of the high-end bars run all night and there is a hefty entrance charge as well. A small pint of canned beer can set you back by $ 12-15, so be ready to pay.

Wanting a Friend?

Exotic places

These are the best places to pick or strike a friendship with the higher class of women. Europeans and Russians dominate and Ukraine girls are not far behind. Do you want the company of a Muslim girl? Fine, this is the place, but the Muslim girls you get here are not the locals but the girls who have come from Egypt, Turkey, Syria, Oman, Iran and they are here because of the restrictions at their places. Here there is freedom and they make the most of it. Don't be taken in by the hijab they wear, for they are more mercenary than others and before they undress for you, they will shave your purse and credit card and maybe you won't mind it for a Muslim girl is exotic as ever.

Bars and Drinks

High end bar

I have been to all the top bars here and naming them is not my cup of tea to give them publicity for nothing, but I will say there is one on the 52nd floor of the Hotel Shangrila and having a Chivas at that altitude with your girlfriend can be exotic. A view of the city beckons and there is a lovely girl DJ playing what you like and it can almost be like nirvana. There are at least a dozen such places in the UAE but be careful not to get drunk and drive. That could spoil everything, for the traffic police is not like in India.

Evaluating Muslim Rule in India

Introduction

Early Moslem conquerors

The Muslims entered India from the 8th century. Initially, their influence was confined to North India, but later their rule encompassed most of the subcontinent, except the far eastern tribal parts. The British entered India as traders, but in a short span of time, they became the rulers.
The Muslims were defeated and they sulked. The British had the distinction of ruling the largest empire in History. In addition, their writ ran in the tribal areas and they created buffer states in Tibet and Afghanistan.

Essential Ingredients of Moslem Rule

Muslim rulers

The Moslem rule, however, was quite different from the British rule. One aspect of Moslem rule was that destruction of temples. This led to widespread carnage because Muslims regarded the Hindus as infidels and therefore slaughtered and converted millions of Hindus. The famous writer Will Durant(1885-1981) argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage" states
“
"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period."

Thus some of the holiest shrines of the Hindus like Ayodhya, Brindavan, and Kashi among others were razed to the ground and mosques built on their ruins. This was because the Moslem never considered the benefits of their subjects, so intent was they in spreading Islam. They also clamped archaic laws on their subjects like Jizzia as enshrined in the Koran.

It is estimated that the Hindu population decreased by 80 million during the Muslim rule.

Moslem Rule, a Dark Age

accepting Jizziya

However there were some enlightened rulers among the Moslem, but their rule was only marked by a degree of tyranny being less. Thus Akbar was less of a tyrant than Aurangzeb, but he also in a number of instances ground the Hindus to dust under his feet.
The Moslem rule was thus a period of a dark age in the subcontinent and it was a godsend that the British arrived. One shudders to think what would have happened In case the British rule had not come to India. This thought that is both frightening and scary as the Moslem rule would have further crushed the Hindus. One cannot forget the slaughter of 100,000 Hindus by Timur-e-Lang during his occupation of Delhi in 1398.

Two aspects of Moslem rule forcible conversion to Islam and the destruction of Hindu temples and building of mosques on them cannot be wished away. The imposition of Jizzia and the failure to spread education and a universal law applicable to every citizen will dam Moslem rule. Some Moslem did use Hindus in high positions, but only to further their cause and not for any other purpose.

Last Word

Selection for Moslem Harem

The British rule, on the other hand, had its limitations, but the concept of a secular nation and universal spread education and applicability of laws to all and sundry will mark this age as perhaps one of the best in Indian history. As Nirad Choudhry wrote "To the memory of the British Empire in India, which conferred subjecthood upon us, but withheld citizenship; to which yet every one of us threw out the challenge: ``Civis Britannicus sum' because all that was good and living within us was made, shaped, and quickened by the same British rule"
But the Moslem rule was a dark age and it must be seen for what it was without wishing it away.

Fertilizing the White European Women

The exodus

Fertilizing and the harem

Europe is besieged by a great exodus from the Muslim lands from the arc of the Mediterranean Sea to the Middle East and even as far as Pakistan. This is mass migration and follows the famous pull and push theory. Such migrations have taken place throughout history. However, this migration is different as Europe has a shortage of labor and the Islamic followers are looking for a better life away from their war-ravaged lands. An initial lot of migrants were welcomed by the European powers. The motive was selfish as the European nations were in need of labor to service their menial jobs.

Exhortations of the Imams

In the harem

.
The reason for this shortage of labor is the low birthrate of European women, which means a declining younger population. Europe wanted cheap labor and the West Asian Muslims obliged. They were soon at their wit's end as they were flummoxed by the magnitude of the exodus and had to down shutters. The exodus was also given a religious twist and this appealed to younger Muslim men.

The Imam of the Al Aksa mosque in Jerusalem broadcast in his sermons the need of the Muslim men to fertilize the European women as the Christians had failed to do so. He pointed to the low birth rate of the European women and exhorted his followers to spread Islam by fertilizing them. Many Muslim felt this was an excellent method to spread Islam. In any case, the Koran looks favorably on migration as a means to spread Islam.

Bizarre thought:Gandhi could have served British interests in India

Gandhi is a holy cow in Indian history. No doubt he played a pivotal role in the 20th century, but there is another view of his activities. I hope I can generate some discussion on this topic.

Another Face of Gandhi

Gandhi

Gandhi was a pivotal figure in Indian history during the 20th century. Many say, he won freedom for India from the Raj. But there is a line of thought that postulates that Mahatma Gandhi was 'a British agent 'who did great harm to India.

This line of thought appears bizarre and bound to draw a lot of flak. Nevertheless, I write such things as I believe that there must be a healthy discussion on such matters. I would like to submit that in my view the actions of Gandhi only served the cause of British rule and their ultimate agenda for the subcontinent. In that respect, perhaps unwittingly he became a British agent who did great harm to India. How did this happen? Read on.

Firstly we must remember that India has tremendous diversity, so many religions, castes, races, languages, etc. Such diversity helped the British
In their policy of divide and rule. Gandhi served the cause of British interest
by constantly injecting religion into politics for many decades. Thus Gandhi furthered the British policy of divide and rule.

Gandhi's public speeches and writings as read now in various magazines bring out that right from 1915, when he came to India from South Africa till his death in 1948, he would emphasize Hindu religious ideas e.g. Ramrajya, Go Raksha ( cow protection ), brahmacharya ( celibacy ), varnashram dharma ( caste system ), etc ( see Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi ). This cannot be denied.

Gandhi wrote in ' Young India ' on 10.6.1921 " I am a Sanatani Hindu. I believe in the varnashram dharma. I believe in protection of the cow ". In his public meetings the Hindu bhajan ' Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram ' would be loudly sung.

Indians by nature are religious people. A sadhu or swami may preach such ideas to his followers in his ashram, but when they are preached by a political leader, what effect will these speeches and writings have on an orthodox Muslims? It will drive him towards a Muslim organization like the Muslim League, and this is exactly what happened. Was this not serving the British policy of divide and rule? By constantly injecting religion into politics for several decades, Gandhi perhaps unwittingly acted as a British agent?

In India a revolutionary movement against British rule had started in the early 20th century under the Anushilan Samiti, Jugantar, and revolutionaries like Surya Sen, Ramprasad Bismil ( who wrote the song ' Sarfaroshi ki tamanna ab hamare dil mein hai ), Chandrashekhar Azad, Ashfaqulla, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, etc ( who were all hanged by the British ). Gandhi successfully diverted the freedom struggle from this revolutionary direction to a harmless nonsensical channel called Satyagrah. This also served British interests.

Gandhi's economic ideas were thoroughly reactionary. He was against industrialization and preached hand spinning by charkha and other such reactionary nonsense.

The 1947 Hindu, Sikh -Muslim riots in Punjab brings out his bias. With millions of killed and women raped, Gandhi never ventured to Punjab. Why? Nobody, even his apologists can answer. In effect, his action or inaction served British interests and helped divide India. The British created Pakistan. It's another matter that Pakistan the British creation became an enfante terrible fomenting terror groups.